[94] The union had not been formally "recognized" at any time.
[95] Coppage _v._ Kansas, 236 U.S. (1915).
[96] Hitchman Coal and Coke Co. _v._ Mitchell et al, 245 U.S. 229
(1917).
[97] Duplex Printing Press Co. _v._ Deering, 41 Sup. Ct. 172 (1921).
[98] Montana allows the "unfair list" and California allows all
boycotts.
[99] American Steel Foundries of Granite City, Illinois, _v._ Tri-City
Central Trades' Council, 42 Sup. Ct. 72 (1921).
[100] Truax et al. _v._ Corrigan, 42 Sup. Ct. 124 (1921).
PART III
CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES
CHAPTER 12
AN ECONOMIC INTERPRETATION
To interpret the labor movement means to offer a theory of the struggle
between labor and capital in our present society. According to Karl
Marx, the founder of modern socialism, the efficient cause in all the
class struggles of history has been technical progress. Progress in the
mode of making a living or the growth of "productive forces," says Marx,
causes the coming up of new classes and stimulates in each and all
classes a desire to use their power for a maximum class advantage.
Pages:
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385